Sydney trains industrial action set to end as NSW government agrees to fleet safety changes

Sydney trains industrial action set to end as NSW government agrees to fleet safety changes

The fleet, first slated to start going into service in 2019, is being in storage on the NSW Central Coast, costing taxpayers $30 million a month. Elliott said that, while the government did not desire to spend hundreds of countless dollars on new trains, the cost of storing them was starting to bite.”These settlements and this expense is in the very best interest of the communities. Am I happy about spending countless dollars to modify what the safety regulator has said are completely excellent trains? Definitely not,” he said.”But the expense of this commercial action, the expense to the NSW economy, the hassle to the commuters has to be front of mind when it pertains to running public transportation.”As part of the deal, the government wishes to eliminate a veto power– main to the intercity fleet conflict– held by the rail union that enables it to refuse to staff brand-new trains it deems unsafe.Claassens said a “fair indication” of delegates views on the new offer would emerge throughout settlements with senior federal government authorities on Thursday, which was likely to identify whether rail workers pushed ahead with strategies to substantially intensify industrial action.The union also wished to make sure that the cost of customizing the trains was not deducted from the pay of rail workers, who are working out a new three-year wage deal.The government has provided rail employees a one-off payment of $3185 and a 3 per cent wage increase in the very first year, followed by 3.5 percent and 2.5 per cent.The latest deal comes just two months after Treasurer Matt Kean and Employee Relations Minister Damien Tudehope promised the federal government would not bow to the union calls for the adjustments, which they stated were unreasonable and would cost $1 billion.Kean said at the time that the federal government had drawn “a line in the sand” and would rule out modifying the fleet, which he referred to as an “outrageous” demand.This content was initially published here.


Related Post